Life at CalceyOpinion

Calcey Technologies adopts a domain-driven design approach


Domain-Driven Design (DDD) is an object-oriented approach to designing software based on the business domain, its elements and behaviours, and the relationships between them. It aims to build software systems that are a realization of the underlying business domain, by defining a domain model1 expressed in the language of business domain experts.

The core idea is that the business domain stakeholders and the technical team must communicate in a ubiquitous language. A domain model can be viewed as a framework from which different solutions can then be rationalized. For example, the domain might be retail, and three different solutions sitting on the domain model for retail sales might be:

  1. An online store for the general public.
  2. An order processing system for the store’s staff.
  3. A special offers app for mobile devices, that notifies customers about offers based on proximity to the store.

The domain model will be defined with the assistance of experts in the retail business, where certain “fundamental” concepts in the retail trade will be built into the model as entities, value objects and aggregates. These entities will reside within a domain layer in the conceptual architecture of the overall system, to be leveraged by upper layers that render end-user functionality.

We recently adopted a domain-driven design approach to build an app for the centralized distribution and control of Multimedia Marketing Content to Sales Staff. The business domain is one of marketing content management, and we sought our client’s expertise in this field to help build a generic domain model.

In marketing content management, the basic concept is that there are market segments (aka business units), and marketing content is associated with these segments. The actual content can be folders or multimedia content items. In domain-driven design, your objective is to create a model of the domain. You need to identify what are the items (entities) you need to accomplish the desired functionalities of your application. You need to identify the relationships among different entities and how they interact among themselves. You need to find if the business goal of your client is achievable using your domain model. You do not need to know how and where the data of your domain will persist or even if the data do need to persist while you do the model of the domain.

This ignorance about your persistence medium will make your domain model free from any coupling with the persistence layer of the application. This will eventually separate the concerns of persistence and its communication mechanism from your domain model. As a result, your application will be free from coupling with any data store and will be very easily unit testable.

Of course, in a real application, you do need to have a database. But your domain model will have no knowledge about that. All it will know is the existence of a “repository”  that will eventually manage your application’s persistence concerns.

I hope I was able to provide a teeny insight into what DDD is about. Eric Evans popularized the DDD approach by presenting this concept in “Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software”. I strongly recommend this excellent book to all budding software architects. Here is a diagram from Evans’ work, describing the key patterns involved.

Let us part with this thought; imagine, once your code becomes readable to those familiar with the business domain, both peer review and knowledge transfer would become a whole lot easier.

  1. Domain-driven architectural style (definition by Microsoft):
  2. Domain-driven design by Eric Evans:
  3. A quick refresher on DDD: